Sign Up for Email News

  • CommuterPageBlog and CommuterPage.com
    Sign up to receive new blog posts by email. You can also choose to receive current stories from local news sources about biking, walking, Metro, local bus systems, and more.

Google Search

  • Search
    Google

    WWW
    commuter.typepad.com
Powered by TypePad

« The Getaway | Main | Driving, Driving and Even More Driving »

November 28, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451f42669e2010536294d4f970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Getting There and Back on Two Wheels:

Comments

Joe

I was aware that there are arguments against separate bike lanes, but haven't seen data to support the arguments. Allen, if you can point us to data, I really would like to see it. I have seen studies that show that when bike lanes are provided, more people ride bikes. Here's an article about a recent Penn State study. (Probably not coincidentally, the article is from the Portland Tribune.)

http://www.portlandtribune.com/sustainable/story.php?story_id=122402296838932000

The Penn State study suggests that dedicated bike facilities open up bike riding to a huge number of people who otherwise would not ride. In addition to listening to the existing bicycling community and bike advocates, it makes sense to me to pay attention to people who don't ride bikes now, and find out why.

What intrigued me about the bike lane/bike box combination was that it clearly made it legitimate for bicyclists to move to the front of the line at red lights. If that could be done safely, it would show a decision to give cyclists a positive advantage over cars in getting where they want to go. Most bike and pedestrian initiatives I've seen are only designed to make it a little less likely that they'll be killed.

Allen Muchnick

Colored bike lanes and bike boxes have typically been installed as band-aid fixes to badly designed bike lanes and/or badly flawed traffic laws (in Oregon) that direct bicyclists and/or motorists to violate the standard rules of the road when approaching or navigating intersections, where most car-bike crashes occur.

In urban communities such as Arlington and Washington DC, where motoring in the curb lane is often at or below bicyclists speeds, ordinary striped bike lanes are often already overkill. Painted bike lanes and bike boxes may make unsafely positioned bicyclists more visible, but the best and least expensive approach is to better educate bicyclists and NOT install ANY bike lanes on many of the streets where they now exist.

As John Forester says, "bicyclists fare best when they act--and are treated--as drivers of vehicles." Bicycling as a vehicle driver is neither difficult nor dangerous, whereas bike lanes and bike boxes can put even competent bicyclists at considerable risk.

Sprawl and Crawl Steve

Now those are the kind of innovations that make it easier for people to ride their bikes. It would be nice to see more of that around here.

Joe

I've seen pictures taken in Vancouver and Portland of brightly-colored bike lanes combined with "bike boxes," painted the same color, at intersections. The bike boxes put bicycles at the front of the line at red lights and are supposed to reduce conflicts between bikes and turning vehicles. Having both the bike lane and the bike box painted the same color looks like it would give a strong visual cue to drivers when they're crossing "bike territory" and should be especially watchful for cyclists.

The comments to this entry are closed.

CommuterPage.com Commuter News