Editors Note: I've received a lot of reaction to my recent post (Lexus Lanes Just Wrong, March 25, 2007, CommuterPageBlog) agreeing with Marc Fisher's column in the Washington Post that was negative regarding HOT or Lexus Lanes. In the interest of fairness I'm providing another view that was done in the form of an Op-Ed by Geoffrey Segal in the Times Community News yesterday. I should note that many of my industry colleagues hold the same view as Mr. Segal. Let us know what you think.
Another Voice: Hot Lanes Make Sense
Recently, Prince William Board of County Supervisors Chairman Corey Stewart (R) called High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes "a sham." It seems Stewart and his colleagues on the Prince William Board of County Supervisors would rather see commuters stuck in traffic than give them an option to spend more time with friends and families at home.
HOT lanes have successfully relieved congestion everywhere they've been implemented. They've been so successful that they're supported from the political left and right alike, from environmental groups such as the Environmental Defense Fund to local business associations.
If you're unfamiliar with HOT lanes, they use variable pricing to mitigate congestion and ensure a free flow of traffic. As demand goes up, so does the toll; likewise, the price goes down with a drop in demand.











In today's Washington Post, there's a great story by John Ward Anderson (

